Re: [ICL] Proposal to support other set/map implementations

From: Ivan Matek (libbooze_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-09-18 16:37:52

On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 3:02 PM Martin Duvanel <martin.duvanel_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> No we did not, but it may be worth trying it out too, thanks for the
> advice.
>
If you have blog/twitter feel free to share experiences if you try it out,
I am curious how it behaves IRL.

> In the end we will probably end up rewriting something more suited to our
> needs. ICL provided a quick and easy way to implement it, but not optimised
> given the scale we use it at.
>
That is a bit of a shame, but at least ICL gave you nice way to quickly
verify design works.