Boost logo

Boost :

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-10-18 13:12:02


Glen Fernandes wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 7:47 AM Andrey Semashev wrote:
> >
> > On 10/18/21 4:22 AM, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> > Writing more string_view types is not the answer for the reasons I
> > wrote earlier. At some point you will have a problem of
> > interoperability between those types, only more of them.
> >
> > > (Or tell your users to switch to C++23 I suppose.)
> >
> > I'm not sure what C++23 has to do with this.
>
> C++23 could get
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p1989r2.pdf

cppreference shows it as C++23

https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/string/basic_string_view/basic_string_view

so maybe it already got voted in? I haven't kept track.


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk