Re: boost.spawn: review requested

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-11-28 15:36:21

Oliver Kowalke wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to propose the new library boost.spawn (https://olk.github.io/) for
> review.
> boost.asio's boost::asio::spawn() uses the deprecated and inefficient
> boost.coroutine library.
> boost.spawn provides the same functionality while using boost.context's fiber
> directly.

The documentation of spawn_fiber often says

"must have signature void(basic_yield_context<Handler>)"

on signatures where there's no Handler.