Re: boost.spawn: review requested

From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-11-29 20:47:21

On 29/11/2021 20:38, Oliver Kowalke via Boost wrote:
> Am Mo., 29. Nov. 2021 um 21:30 Uhr schrieb Niall Douglas via Boost <
> boost_at_[hidden]>:
> 
>>
>> As an alternative, how about announcing the complete removal of
>> Boost.Coroutine with two major release notice (including this release)?
>> That should spur Boost.ASIO being upgraded to Boost.Coroutine2.
>>
> 
> That had already happen some years ago - including warnings during
> compilations - but didn't help. Ask Vini...
> At the end I was forced to remove the compiler (preprocessor) warnings.

Alas I'm probably one of the very few here who would be absolutely fine 
with removing completely Boost.Coroutine after two major releases, and 
whatever didn't fix itself and broke with that sufficient amount of 
warning well that's on them in my book.

I assume there's no way you can shim Coroutine's API into a Coroutine2 
implementation, then you can drop Coroutine?

Niall