Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Kenneth Porter (shiva_at_[hidden])
Date: 2022-04-16 00:11:37

Next message: Glen Fernandes: "Re: Is there a design reason why beast static_string uses size_t for length?"
Previous message: Ivan Matek: "Is there a design reason why beast static_string uses size_t for length?"
In reply to: Robert Ramey: "Re: [release] Boost 1.79.0"
Next in thread: Glen Fernandes: "Re: [release] Boost 1.79.0"

On 4/15/2022 1:50 PM, Robert Ramey via Boost wrote:
> Hmmm - is there any reason you can't build it yourself locally?

I DO build it locally from the source zip file. And get those warnings.
So I have to re-apply those patches with every release.

Next message: Glen Fernandes: "Re: Is there a design reason why beast static_string uses size_t for length?"
Previous message: Ivan Matek: "Is there a design reason why beast static_string uses size_t for length?"
In reply to: Robert Ramey: "Re: [release] Boost 1.79.0"
Next in thread: Glen Fernandes: "Re: [release] Boost 1.79.0"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk