|
Boost : |
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2022-05-05 14:58:41
On Thu, 5 May 2022 at 16:26, Kostas Savvidis via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> [...]
> In other words, boost needs to shrink not grow.
I mostly agree, but I'd say Boost needs to undergo a restructurisation to
remain attractive to all generations of developers, maintainers and users.
I can't see it happen unless we have separate superprojects:
github.com/boostorg/boost (require>=C++17)
github.com/boostorg/boost11 (>=C++11 )
and, if still relevant, perhaps:
github.com/boostorg/boost03
As a maintainer, I'd like to be free to maintain a library
only for e.g. boostorg/boost and forget about
boostorg/boost11, or let new maintainer to take it
over there.
Best regards
-- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk