Boost logo

Boost :

From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2022-05-13 17:29:21


On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 3:12 AM Ruben Perez via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> ...Google's protobufs...creates licensing
> conflicts with anything submitted to Boost.

If you are only reading protobufs and using the most common subset of
its features, it should be fairly easy to do a clean-room
implementation of just the part of the protobuf format that you need
to make your library work. It wouldn't be that much code either. It
would not be necessary (or desirable) to require linking with the
stock protobuf library.

Thanks


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk