Re: Potentially include xproc library in boost?

From: Gavin Lambert (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2022-08-07 23:01:12

On 6/08/2022 20:35, Klemens Morgenstern wrote:
> I am not sure if the lack of responses to your email indicates little
> interest in this library however. I seem to remember one review rejecting
> boost.process because it did not have those features, leading me to
> conclude that there is some interest. It would be worth finding out how
> much though.

Perhaps then it may be useful to approach the maintainer of 
Boost.Process about the possibility of integrating the functionality 
into that?

While they are somewhat different responsibilities, they do share some 
common themes.  And while I'm not sure if it's actually easier to 
integrate a large feature into an existing library vs. introducing a 
separate library, it is at least an alternative hill that could be climbed.