Re: Boost warning philosophy

From: Gavin Lambert (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2022-08-30 04:15:47

On 30/08/2022 14:58, Scott Johnson wrote:
> What is, if anything, the Boost policy towards compiler diagnostics of
> this sort?  Is there a set of warnings we should be prepared to ignore
> if we use Boost with a more modern (and pickier) compiler?  Should we
> perhaps consider another version of GCC?   An older, more mature
> version of Boost (we don't need any specific features in the current
> one)?

One quick GCC-specific option might be to include Boost with -isystem 
instead of -I; this should disable most warnings generated within, 
although templates are occasionally weirder.