Re: Revitalization

From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2022-12-06 23:21:57

On 12/6/22 2:38 PM, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> Robert Ramey wrote:
>> Wouldn't all this discussion be irrelevant if Boost was distributed only as
>> source code and not pre-compiled libraries?
> 
> That's exactly how we're distributing it.
> 
I'm aware of that.  But it seems to me that many use the pre-built 
library versions distributed with linux os versions.  I confess I have 
no data supporting this though.  I can't understand why this is a 
problem if one is building his own binaries from source.