Re: Boost.Text is looking for a (mini-)review manager

From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2022-12-07 08:50:03

For the record, Zach requested to mark the Text submission as withdrawn [1].
So, we currently are not looking for review manager.

[1] https://github.com/boostorg/website/commit/f1da3a92969d0e778b43c0a77ac16dffee8c8af4

On Sun, 23 Aug 2020 at 01:05, Zach Laine via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> I've made all the recommended changes to Boost.Text that came up in
> the review.  Glen, the previous review manager, recommended a mini
> review of Boost.Text once I'd made those changes.
>
> If you'd like to manage the mini-review, please let me know.
>
> For everyone, including potential reviewers and review managers, here
> are the major changes:
>
> * All the specific review feedback issues have been addressed.
> * The string layer is now gone.
> * The text layer got a major re-work.  It is now a set of
> template-based adaptors
> (basic_text<>, vs. a text typedef. etc.), which lets everyone get what
> they want.  You can change the underlying storage type (including
> whatever allocator you prefer), select UTF-8 or UTF-16, and change the
> normalization form. Glen recommended I drop this layer, but the
> library is way less useful without this stuff, and these changes
> address all the concerns raised about the text layer  in the review.
>
> The updated docs can be found here:
>
> https://tzlaine.github.io/text/doc/html/index.html
>
> Oh yeah, and I added concept constraints to the whole library when you
> build in C++20 mode.
>
> Zach
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net