|
Boost : |
From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2023-01-19 17:40:22
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 9:32 AM Ruben Perez via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 7. There is no sync counterpart to async_receive, async_exec and async_run, which is unusual in Asio-based libraries - is that intentional?
Speaking for myself, I am done with synchronous Asio. It offers no
control over timeouts, no cancellation, and no possibility to
implement full duplex algorithms which are common outside of HTTP/1.
Synchronous sockets just don't provide enough utility to justify the
cost (extra implementation, documentation, examples, tests, and
maintenance).
Thanks
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk