|
Boost : |
From: Hans Dembinski (hans.dembinski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2023-02-06 09:29:52
> On 4. Feb 2023, at 14:34, Andrey Semashev via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Personally, I don't think dropping any Boost libraries, even
> unmaintained ones, benefits our users. Especially not, if it is
> impossible to use Boost 2.x and 1.x in the same code base. And I suspect
> that we don't want to mess with changing namespaces and macro names,
> which means 1.x and 2.x are mutually exclusive in the same code base.
bcp is the tool that we ship to have more than one Boost version in a project at the same time. It does the namespace renaming. Wouldn't this also work here to have both at the same?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk