Re: Dropping C++03 support (again)

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2023-02-17 18:01:19

Andrey Semashev wrote:
> On 2/17/23 19:17, Jeff Garland via Boost wrote:
> >
> >> rush to deliver spaceship broke some code
> >
> > So what? Progress can't be made without *some* mistakes -- as you
> > should know, there are a lot of complicated cases.  The fixes for that
> > breakage weren't difficult.
> 
> I wouldn't say so. We still haven't fixed Boost.Operators (not for the lack of
> trying), which still remains officially broken in C++20.
> 
> https://github.com/boostorg/utility/issues/65
> 
> In fact, this very issue is the reason I'm hesitant upgrading my projects to
> C++20 and beyond.

Seconded.

https://github.com/boostorg/function/issues/45

C++23 makes it somewhat better, but doesn't fix everything.