|
Boost : |
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2023-02-17 19:40:36
Vinnie Falco wrote:
> We need to re-render all of this historical release notes, such as:
>
> <https://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_81_0.html>
>
> to be in the style of the new website. This is being taken care of, but it will
> affect the release process as follows:
>
> * Each author will edit the release notes for their library using markdown
> instead of Quickbook format, as a pull request against a file
> here:
>
> <https://github.com/boostorg/website/tree/master/feed/history>
>
> The syntax will be GitHub flavored markdown, with a few Boost-specific
> extensions (for example, to link against an issue in a boostorg repo).
>
> Does anyone object or have comments about this?
The pull request workflow isn't very elegant. It would be better if, say,
every author updates meta/release_notes.md in his repo, and the website
automatically compiles these (as it currently does for meta/libraries.json).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk