Boost logo

Boost :

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2023-04-28 14:35:33


Glen Fernandes wrote:
> On Friday, April 28, 2023, Dominique Devienne wrote:
>
> > Of course, Boost.Compat (or Boost.Polyfill) would need to turn on/off
> > its std:: alternatives depending on the standard level in use.
> >
> >
> If everyone agrees, this can be one of the tenets of Boost.Compat from the
> very beginning.
>
> The "depending on the standard level in use" might be further clarified to
> mean "provides a fully functional std:: version".

An implementation in terms of `using std::something` will be allowed, but
not required.


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk