Re: Q1 2023 Update: C++ Alliance's Efforts (PDF Attached)

From: Julien Blanc (julien.blanc_at_[hidden])
Date: 2023-05-04 06:34:35

Le 2023-05-04 01:44, Gavin Lambert via Boost a écrit :

> This is what I'm seeing -- note that the current thread appears
> semi-flat (even though most of these sibling messages were actually a
> reply chain), but the "replacing the ML with a forum" thread appears
> mostly normal.
> https://imgur.com/a/GfTS6ig

You're luckier than me. The current thread is semi-broken, but the 
"replacing the ML with a forum" one is completely broken for me.

I'm starting to wonder if we all receive the same emails (in the sense 
that they may not contain the same set of headers). For me, the initial 
message of Vinnie in the "replacing the ML with a forum" thread contains 
the following:

Message-ID: 
<010f0187bde5599a-e76c27f2-225d-4d7e-b2c8-887e3a07ecb8-000000_at_us-east-2.amazo>

But Mashshall's answer, on the other side, contains the following 
headers :

References: 
<010f0187bde530fb-ff3c1911-df7d-4399-b5d2-82f8062bf18c-000000_at_us-east-2.amazo>
In-Reply-To: 
<010f0187bde530fb-ff3c1911-df7d-4399-b5d2-82f8062bf18c-000000_at_us-east-2.amazo>

The "In-Reply-To" should match the Id of the initial message, for 
threading to work correctly. This is too obvious to be a client bug. Can 
someone check the Message-ID he has for the initial message of Vinnie in 
the "replacing the ML with a forum" thread? If it's different from mine, 
then that's probably the source of the issues.

Regards,

Julien