Re: [Async] Naming land grab?

From: Klemens Morgenstern (klemensdavidmorgenstern_at_[hidden])
Date: 2023-10-02 14:48:34

On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 10:43 PM Christian Mazakas via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> I'm not going to submit a review but I do think the name is almost a misnomer.
>
> The library is essentially just an Asio wrapper and isn't a genuine
> coroutine library.

What would be a genuine asynchronous coroutine library?

>
> I think the name Async gives the wrong impressions and expectations in
> addition to being much too generic of a name for what the library
> actually does.
>

What would be those expectations? What functionality should it include?