Re: [Async] Naming land grab?

From: Phil Endecott (spam_from_boost_dev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2023-10-02 16:57:24

Niall Douglas wrote:
> I have received a non-public review which raises concerns about the 
> naming land grab by proposed Boost.Async i.e. a Boost library called 
> "Async" claims too much through its name.
>
> Seeing as nobody here has raised this concern to date, can I confirm 
> everybody here is fine with proposed Boost.Async being called Boost.Async?
>
> If you are not, please suggest a preferred alternative name.
>
> Niall

Boost.Asio.Async, or similar.

I'd make a similar argument for other libraries that are highly dependent
on ASIO.

Regards, Phil.