Re: [Async] Naming land grab?

From: Richard Hodges (hodges.r_at_[hidden])
Date: 2023-10-02 18:26:12

On Mon, 2 Oct 2023 at 18:31, Vinnie Falco via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 9:18 AM Vinnie Falco <vinnie.falco_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
> > If you are not, please suggest a preferred alternative name.
>
> Twenty more:
>
> Boost.CoroMate
> Boost.AsioWave
> Boost.AsyncFusion
> Boost.PromiseIO
> Boost.AsioFlow
> Boost.Awaitables
> Boost.CoroutineSphere
> Boost.GenTasks
> Boost.IOPromise
> Boost.ASyncor
> Boost.EvolveAsync
> Boost.Corollary
> Boost.AwaitSphere
> Boost.TaskWave
> Boost.CoroutineCraft
> Boost.AsyncNest
> Boost.AwaitFusion
> Boost.CoRoutineHub
> Boost.Genio (Generator + Asio)
> Boost.ElasticAsync

I miss the days when libraries and useful programs are given terse names
that were fun and easy to remember.

biff, mutt, vi, sed etc spring to mind.

>
> Thanks
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>