Re: [boost.async] new name

From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2023-10-13 14:51:02

On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 7:34 AM Christian Mazakas via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Agreed. There's no need to tie the name to something async-y. Several
> Boost libraries have whimsical names and they're great.
>

I missed my chance: Boost.Earl

Thanks