|
Boost : |
From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2023-11-28 17:26:56
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 8:07â¯AM Jeff Garland via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Scope facilities are currently *only in a technical spec*, so if there's
> something compelling that's missing that could be changed before it's
> proposed for the standard. Getting some experience with that sort of thing
> is very valuable to making the standard better in the first place.
Good point. Going into committee with field experience in hand (e.g.
"we made the enter and exit behaviors callables so they could be
customized by the user") is very helpful for shaping additions and
modifications to the standard library - a point I have been trying to
emphasize for years. There's a conversation to be had about the
committee completely ignoring existing practice but that's a topic for
another thread.
Thanks
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk