Re: The standard library is better documented

From: René Ferdinand Rivera Morell (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2023-12-04 14:50:24

On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 8:36 AM Hans Dembinski <hans.dembinski_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>
> > On 2. Dec 2023, at 16:57, René Ferdinand Rivera Morell via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > It would be useful if you could point to instances of Boost libraries
> > that could use better documentation.
>
> Can we organise a user poll that ranks all Boost libraries on how well documented they are?
>
> Might be a fun way to approach this and it provides an opportunity to create some publicity for Boost when we advertise this. I can see the news headline: "Boost devs finally respond to user cries for better docs"
>
> I think the results would be very interesting. The top libraries on this list would then serve as examples for everyone else.
>
> We could repeat this poll in regular intervals to reward improvements in documentation.

Sounds like a good/fun idea to me.

-- 
-- René Ferdinand Rivera Morell
-- Don't Assume Anything  -- No Supone Nada
-- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net