Boost logo

Boost :

From: Richard (legalize_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-02-28 21:26:51

In article <CALOpkJCSm3-YEfhYVuWZG+XPco09LfOodope37QjOn40qGGQ_Q_at_[hidden]> you write:
>I should have mentioned -- I recently removed the ascii::* parsers,
>which used is_*() from the C standard library. It included
>ascii::alnum. I removed them because those is_*() functions are
>considered just plain wrong by me and lots of other people from SG-16
>(the committee's Unicode study group).

Is there a link to some discussion about why they are considered
'wrong'? Certainly they're correct for ASCII.

"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <>
            The Terminals Wiki <>
     The Computer Graphics Museum <>
  Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <>

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at