|
Boost : |
From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-03-26 13:03:24
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 5:56â¯AM Andrey Semashev via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> My understanding of the original post is that dropping C++11 is what's
> desired
>
With respect to the libraries I have written, that's going a bit too far
for my taste. Arbitrarily dropping C++11 does not sound like a great idea.
If requiring at least C++14 offers a significant improvement in some aspect
of a library (for example Boost.JSON) then the specifics of that
improvement should be discussed and the cost/benefits analyzed.
Thanks
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk