Re: On Boost and modules

From: Boris Kolpackov (boris_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-04-09 17:50:07

Peter Dimov via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> writes:
 
> That's kind of like the monolithic vs modular debacle, modular is
> aesthetically more pleasant, but monolithic works and is less hassle.

Modular works just fine if you have proper tooling. We've had Boost
split into packages at library granularity in build2 for a couple
of years now and I've not once heard from our users that it's a
hassle or that they wish it was a single package.