|
Boost : |
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-05-10 15:59:42
On 10/05/2024 16:45, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> Niall Douglas wrote:
>
> Did you (as in, you, Ben Craig, or one of the others) ever write this up in some
> form? I would certainly be interested in reading about it.
My memory is that it was mostly written up in private email exchanges
amongst a small group. I wasn't always included in the discussion,
either, so I only saw parts of the debate and design.
I do remember seeing at one point a private github repo with some code,
and me writing an email saying something like "no no no that's all
wrong, do X, Y and Z instead" :)
In any case I'm the wrong person to ask about this, as I wasn't invited
into the main group who did most of the running. Ben I think would be a
much better bet. I'll CC him there now to this.
> I remember your having a paper about Microsoft COM, but if memory serves,
> I found it a bit difficult to understand. In particular, it wasn't quite clear what
> exactly was being proposed; as in, what needs to change, in language or library,
> and how.
That was a very, very long time ago.
That was the thing I built for BlackBerry while I was working there.
Basically a modernised Microsoft COM. Fully working implementation.
Would have solved lots of future C++ ABI upgrade problems in BB10.
Unfortunately, my colleagues at BlackBerry at the time reacted very
similarly to how COM was reacted to in Microsoft when it was presented.
COM only became what it did because a senior manager in Office went
ahead and adopted it anyway despite the negative reaction. And that
forced everybody else to use it, and before you knew it, everything on
Windows had to be COM. And then the COM designers were being showered
with accolades and given cheques of cash bonuses in gratitude.
But yes you're right, I do think Microsoft COM is underrated and if C++
adopted it into the language, it would make a very substantial
improvement to C++. Politically impossible, unfortunately. Gaby dos Reis
tried to effectively propose a modernised COM for C++ Modules
originally, and to say that went down like a lead balloon would be
putting it mildly.
Niall
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk