|
Boost : |
From: Rainer Deyke (rdeyke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-07-06 11:23:50
On 03.07.24 15:52, Phil Endecott via Boost wrote:
> Joaquin Lopez Munoz wrote:
>> For its own protection and that of other users, any service provider
>> must be able to deny (or at least prohibit) access to malicious users
>> (like, for instance, those posting illegal content)
>
> By definition, it's already illegal to post illegal content. Websites don't
> need additional terms of use to prohibit what's already illegal.
Furthermore, having terms of use is actually counterproductive for
blocking users/content. In the absence of a contract the website owner
can block whoever they want, for any reason whatsoever, at any time. In
the presence of a terms-of-use contract, the user is legally entitled to
use the website under those terms, and can sue if unfairly blocked.
-- Rainer Deyke (rainerd_at_[hidden])
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk