Re: [Asset Stewardship] About the Beman Project

From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-09-11 09:21:20

El 11/09/2024 a las 1:49, David Sankel via Boost escribió:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 7:46 PM Klemens Morgenstern <
> klemensdavidmorgenstern_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2024, 7:33 AM David Sankel via Boost <
>> boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 6:42 PM Vinnie Falco via Boost <
>>> boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> WG21 is incapable of competing in the library marketplace.
>>>
>>>
>>> This outlook will repel folks working on WG21 from coming here.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Why? Do you think they can't take criticism?
>>
> 
> Yep, you got it. They're just not man enough to come to Boost and take one
> on the chin!

That phrase would go against the CoC if we had one! ;-)

Now seriously. I expect that once the situation is calmed, we should 
analyze the cooperation between Boost and WG21/standardization.

Beman project is new way to do it, but as everything in Boost, each 
author could pick a different way (direct WG21 participation, Beman 
project...).

Best,

Ion