Re: [Asset Stewardship] About the Beman Project

From: Joaquín M López Muñoz (joaquinlopezmunoz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-09-15 19:42:56

Enviado do meu iPhone

> No dia 15 de set. de 2024, Ã s 21:28, Peter Dimov via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> escreveu:
> 
> Zach Laine wrote:
>> […]
>> Boost wants the best C++ libraries that appeal to its reviewers.  WG21 wants
>> to make sure something is appropriate for the standard.  Those are similar,
>> and even overlapping, but fundamentally different goals.
> 
> It doesn't really matter. For a library to get into the standard it needs to
> undergo design review by LEWG and be accepted by LEWG. Adding a Boost
> review on top of that can never be a "win" for the author, because it can
> only increase the probability of rejection.

It would if field experience weighed more in
WG21’s acceptance criteria. 

Joaquin M Lopez Munoz