Boost logo

Boost :

From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-10-07 05:02:24


On 10/6/24 5:31 PM, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 6, 2024 at 5:21 PM Robert Ramey via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/6/24 5:06 PM, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:
>>> Should Boost have kept C++03?
>>
>> ...The recent effort to "deprecate" support for older compilers was
>> a total waste of time and effort and added nothing to boost....
>
>
> After trimming away the superfluous words, your answer can be stated
> concisely as "yes" (to keeping C++03)

LOL - any C++03 compatible code is also compatible with the latest
version of C++. It is not within anyone's power to "keep" or "not keep"
C++03. It's always there and always will be as long as C++ keeps it
promise to maintain backward compatibility.

>
> Thanks
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk