Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-10-08 15:54:31

Next message: Matt Borland: "Re: Scheduled review of Decimal library"
Previous message: Kostas Savvidis: "Re: Scheduled review of Decimal library"
In reply to: Christophe Henry: "(no subject)"
Next in thread: Vinnie Falco: "Re: (no subject)"

Christophe Henry wrote:
> Strong no for ever even thinking of removing a Boost library from 1.x.

I agree in principle except for "Compatibility", a "library" that was
already obsolete 20 years ago and whose only purpose today is to
enable people to introduce mysterious compile errors into their code.

I've already suggested its removal to Glen.

https://github.com/boostorg/compatibility

Next message: Matt Borland: "Re: Scheduled review of Decimal library"
Previous message: Kostas Savvidis: "Re: Scheduled review of Decimal library"
In reply to: Christophe Henry: "(no subject)"
Next in thread: Vinnie Falco: "Re: (no subject)"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk