|
|
Boost : |
From: Seth (bugs_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-10-08 20:52:33
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024, at 9:03 PM, Christophe Henry via Boost wrote:
>>It would be a non-trivial endeavor for related libraries to stop depending
> on, say, Boost.Move.
Wouldn't it be akin to defining trivial definitions for the macros and preprocessing them? I think this can even be automated with most IDEs (vim will do it for me) or a little libclang script.
Other libraries, agreed that it can be non-trivial
My $0.02,
Seth
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk