Re: [async-mqtt5] Formal review starts today

From: Christian Mazakas (christian.mazakas_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-10-28 16:50:11

On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 8:13 AM Darryl Green via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> A high level library that can do all this needs a tunable "QoS" in the
> general sense (not just the selection of one of 3 values for an MQTT
> parameter). A low level library can legitimately  claim its out of
> scope. This library has high level features but appears to lack some
> tunability (but that could be user ignorance on my part) and also access
> to low level features to allow the user to take responsibility for these
> issues. That needs addressing.
>

I think this frames it quite well. In the wild, there's a lot of different
requirements and there's even more approaches one can take.

I think a well-coded low-level interface gives users the flexibility they
need and I think the way you described it, Darryl, is perfect.

- Christian