Re: async-mqtt5 is CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTED

From: Christian Mazakas (christian.mazakas_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-10-31 15:25:56

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 9:41 PM Klemens Morgenstern via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> I did not write a  summary on purpose,
> because I didn't think criticizing a review was a good idea,
> as it might discourage others from participating in reviews.

 ...

 Yeah, that's cool and all but I never actually expected anyone but me to
understand the importance of protocol libraries.

This is more about the author deliberately dodging any and all negative
criticism of the library, even when other Boost authors explicitly say
these issues are worth talking about.

This review was not handled at the quality a Boost review should be at.

Relevant discussions were not had and then what compounds this is that the
review manager just then does an unqualified acceptance of the library with
no rationale.

- Christian