Boost logo

Boost :

From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-11-05 06:28:57


On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 10:11 AM Peter Dimov via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> I agree with Andrey. Design discussions about a library currently under
> review are supposed to take place on the mailing list. This serves two
> purposes, it helps reviewers who for any reason are struggling to reach
> a final accept/reject verdict, and it can encourage people to review the
> library by piquing their interest.
>

In hindsight I wish the discussions had taken place on the mailing list.
Yet there was far less friction on Slack and ultimately I chose the path of
least resistance, as the immediacy of replies in the moment led to a more
engaging conversation. Perhaps we might explore how these two separate
platforms can be combined to create something greater than each individual
part? Peter how do we fix this?

Thanks


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk