Re: async-mqtt5 is CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTED

From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-11-05 21:46:56

On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 15:35, Klemens Morgenstern via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 8:31 PM Mateusz Loskot via Boost
> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 11:31, Andrey Semashev via Boost <
> > boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > > However, as I've already said, I do think that the discussion should
> > > have happened on the ML.
> >
> > Legitimate or not, personally, that is also my expectation.
>
> I think we need to distinguish three things here:
>
> 1. What a review manager takes into account.
> 2. What reviewer bases his review on.
> 3. How an author acts.
> [...]
>

Thank you for the clarification.

[...] We should define a policy soon, as the next review starts on the 13th
> with a RM (Richard Hodges) and an author (yours truly) that are both
> active on slack.
>

Although I largely agree with your opinion, I don't think it is the right
time
to touch any of the reviews policies. It certainly is not enough time.
I think, there needs to be period of several months allocated for such
discussions during which no reviews are conducted, until the Community
agrees on any updates.

However, some of the instructions and statements in the current
documentation on the reviewing process could be improved
and further clarified indeed.

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net