|
Boost : |
From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-11-10 18:53:46
On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 10:20â¯AM Peter Dimov via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I didn't particularly agree then with that process - for me the review
> manager was, in fact, supposed to tally votes - but the process was
> what it was, and it worked.
>
Did the success come from the process rules, or was it the above-average
skills of the review managers at the time? And how will this process
perform in light of the changing demographics of the volunteer base?
Thanks
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk