Re: [review] [sqlite]

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-11-13 17:33:54

Vinnie Falco wrote:
...
> "these docs are so complete one gets tired of completeness when reading
> them"
> 
> "Should these questions be asked on the list instead of here?"
> 
> "dunno. I'm asking a simple question so far, on expectations I should have"
> 
> "Expect what you would expect from a complete Boost library."
> 
> "I was expecting at least the signatures of functions (Ctors in this instance), at
> least. thus I'm suspecting a ref doc (doxygen based?) generation issue, and
> was inquiring"
> 
> "Fwiw, I don't think it's inappropriate to ask about the docs like that here
> because yeah, that seems kind of just like a simple configuration error I'm
> guessing"
> 
> "these are good things to ask on the list and you should state your
> documentation expectations on the list"
> 
> "I intend to embed the sources in my code base, instead of compiling Boost.
> Will Boost.SQLite be compatible with my existing Boost 1.84, for its
> dependencies (if any)?"
> 
> "darn, all the classes docs aren't there."
...

If nothing else, this serves as a good demonstration as to exactly how
useless a Slack to ML gateway would be.