Re: [hash2][review] Early review (due to holidays)

From: Claudio DeSouza (cdesouza_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-12-04 16:23:45

As I explained in my review, yes, for the authors to accommodate what I'm
asking, it is fair to say that this library would have to depend on some
robust theoretical span library, span2 if you will, and that's why I didn't
vote accept nor reject, because it seems unfair to impose such a
requirement. There are certainly challenges to reconcile these demands
across different C++ standards.

On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 4:14 PM Ivan Matek <libbooze_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 3:23 PM Claudio DeSouza via Boost <
> boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> By the way, C++20 offers byte extensions
>>
>>
>
> Not to speak for author, but if I understand correctly library is C++11
> library intentionally(it explicitly mentions g++ 4.8 in documentation,
> which is 2013 compiler), so any std::byte interface would be  optional/#ifdef
> flavor, and I am not a huge fan of those APIs.
> Sure we could add boost::byte to boost, but that is a different
> discussion.
>
>