|
Boost : |
From: Ruben Perez (rubenperez038_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-12-13 18:00:28
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 at 18:56, Vinnie Falco <vinnie.falco_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 9:42â¯AM Ruben Perez via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> I'd consider splitting it into two functions, maybe finalize_block() and
>> result().
>
>
> I presume your proposed result() is idempotent. Unfortunately this increases the size of the hash algorithm object for many algorithms.
>
> Thanks
>
Yes, that was the case. If there's a strong reason not to do it, I'm
fine with result() as is.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk