|
Boost : |
From: René Ferdinand Rivera Morell (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-12-18 21:06:56
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 9:19â¯PM Chuanqi Xu via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
> > Would have been nice if the `export` keyword was accepted and silently
> ignored
> when outside of module.
> Yes, but we have missed the train.
>
There are more trains. And there's apparently still time for the C++23
train. This is something that would be entirely possible to propose now as
an improvement for adoptability of modules. Who wants to write a proposal?
Actually, we don't even need a train. Implementations could do that now
without any ill effects (and even backported). And use it as implementation
experience. What do you think Chuanqi of implementing that in clang?
-- -- René Ferdinand Rivera Morell -- Don't Assume Anything -- No Supongas Nada -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk