Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2025-01-16 17:57:02

Next message: Matt Borland: "Re: Decimal: Formal review begins."
Previous message: Christopher Kormanyos: "Re: Boost accepted in Google Summer of Code 2021"
In reply to: John Maddock: "Decimal: Formal review begins."
Next in thread: Matt Borland: "Re: Decimal: Formal review begins."
Reply: Matt Borland: "Re: Decimal: Formal review begins."

Has there been given any thought to making decimal32 and it's brethren
"safe" in the sense that Boost.Safe Numerics types are "safe"? Seems to
me to be a worthy idea given the types of applications that this
decimal32 would be meant to support.

Robert Ramey

Next message: Matt Borland: "Re: Decimal: Formal review begins."
Previous message: Christopher Kormanyos: "Re: Boost accepted in Google Summer of Code 2021"
In reply to: John Maddock: "Decimal: Formal review begins."
Next in thread: Matt Borland: "Re: Decimal: Formal review begins."
Reply: Matt Borland: "Re: Decimal: Formal review begins."

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk