Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2025-02-01 18:49:33

Next message: John Maddock: "Re: Decimal Review Result and Summary."
Previous message: John Maddock: "Decimal Review Result and Summary."
In reply to: John Maddock: "Decimal Review Result and Summary."
Next in thread: John Maddock: "Re: Decimal Review Result and Summary."
Reply: John Maddock: "Re: Decimal Review Result and Summary."
Reply: Matt Borland: "Re: Decimal Review Result and Summary."

John Maddock wrote:
> In late breaking news, I also hear from Matt that GCC and IBM both "cheat" by using (mutually incompatible) non-IEEE binary encodings.

Are these documented anywhere? It would be interesting to look at them for inspiration.

Next message: John Maddock: "Re: Decimal Review Result and Summary."
Previous message: John Maddock: "Decimal Review Result and Summary."
In reply to: John Maddock: "Decimal Review Result and Summary."
Next in thread: John Maddock: "Re: Decimal Review Result and Summary."
Reply: John Maddock: "Re: Decimal Review Result and Summary."
Reply: Matt Borland: "Re: Decimal Review Result and Summary."

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk