Re: Decimal Review Result and Summary.

From: Glen Fernandes (glen.fernandes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2025-02-01 18:57:52

On Sat, Feb 1, 2025 at 1:36 PM John Maddock wrote:

> First off I'd like to thank Matt and Chris for submitting the library
> for review, and for all the reviewers who submitted comments.  My
> apologies for not posting this sooner, but this has been a difficult
> review to reach a definite result on.
>
> First the headline result: the result of the review is INDETERMINATE.
>
> What this means in practice: I'd like to encourage Matt and Chris to
> come back for a mini-review at a later date which should focus
> exclusively on the open issues listed below.  I forget which library we
> applied this to in the past, but I believe the result is not without
> precedent.
>

Thank you John for managing the review, and thank you to Matt and Chris for
your (clearly very hard) work on the library.  I am looking forward to a
future revision of the library that I could be enthusiastic about, and that
would grace Boost by its inclusion.

Glen