Re: Git Debug Branch

From: Mohammad Nejati [ashtum] (ashtumashtum_at_[hidden])
Date: 2025-04-11 10:33:27

On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 2:59 AM Robert Ramey via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> I do think we would be better served by shifting more to the feature
> branch way of doing things.  Once one does this, the develop branch
> become superfluous.

Considering the master branch is closed to merges for over a month
during each release cycle, the develop branch gives dependent
libraries a good time window to test out new changes before merging
into master. Otherwise, in the event of a regression, the amount of
changes in master could become overwhelming for the release manager.