![]() |
Boost : |
From: Matt Borland (matt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2025-04-18 14:36:05
> It is not a mere formality that a review manager volunteers and must be
> accepted by the library author. The acceptance means that the author
> trusts that the review manager is qualified enough to evaluate the
> library and the reviews and come up with a fair decision in the end.
>
Does the accomplishment of this task require someone to be an expert in the domain? How are we defining expert? I am with Peter here that I think this wording is too strong, and may scare people off. As long as the library author agrees thinks the review manager is competent and capable that should be sufficient.
Matt
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk