![]() |
Boost : |
From: Ivan Matek (libbooze_at_[hidden])
Date: 2025-04-19 03:15:58
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 9:11â¯PM ÐмиÑÑий ÐÑÑ
ипов via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> пÑ, 18 апÑ. 2025â¯Ð³. в 21:56, Ivan Matek via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>:
> Just to be clear, as far as I am aware, there is no actual
> *requirement* that the review manager is an expert in the reviewed
> library's domain. There is a certain level of understanding of the
> domain that is required to correctly assess the quality of the library
> and of the reviews, but I wouldn't call that being an expert. Like
> many things in Boost, this is kind of based on vibes.
>
>
I was referring to this part.
*In order for a review to proceed, a Boost member must volunteer to manage
the review. This should be someone with experience with the review process
and knowledge of the library's domain. *
from
https://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html
but I agree that this is open to interpretation.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk