Re: [openmethod] On the unreasonable efficiency of fast_perfect_hash

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2025-05-12 14:53:55

Jean-Louis Leroy wrote: 
> type_ids are few, and they are confined in the initialized data segment in
> theory, and in practice they are consecutive in a small range of memory.

Incidentally, am I right in inferring from this conversation that the library
assumes that &typeid(T) == &typeid(T)? This isn't true on Windows when
DLLs are involved, or under other OSes when .so and -fvisibility=hidden.