Re: [openmethod] On the unreasonable efficiency of fast_perfect_hash

From: Seth (bugs_at_[hidden])
Date: 2025-05-12 21:31:07

On Mon, May 12, 2025, at 5:09 PM, Jean-Louis Leroy via Boost wrote:
>> Incidentally, am I right in inferring from this conversation that the library
>> assumes that &typeid(T) == &typeid(T)?
>
> No. See here: https://tinyurl.com/2afhuju6

May I suggest *not* using a URL shortener. 

As a rule, people should not have to click on opaque links in emails.

Here, it's worth more to see https://github.com/jll63/Boost.OpenMethod/blob/BOOST_REVIEW/include/boost/openmethod/compiler.hpp#L371-L400 which immediately conveys that we're going to 30-ish lines of `openmethod/compiler.hpp`.

It's win-win: people see where they will endup, and can also predict what information they might find (to decide whether they want to).

Thanks,
Seth